When President Donald J. Trump stepped off Air Force One on November 25, 2025, reporters asked him a question that had dominated headlines: Was he really thinking about firing Kash Patel, the FBI Director? Trump didn’t pause. He laughed. "No, he’s doing a great job," he said, clearly annoyed. "Cash Patel? Come on." The moment, captured on video and broadcast across networks, wasn’t just a dismissal—it was a public rebuke to a report that had shaken Washington.
White House Fires Back at MS NOW Report
The source of the firestorm? A November 25, 2025, story from MS NOW, citing three anonymous sources who claimed Trump was ready to oust Patel over his use of government resources. The report alleged Patel had deployed an FBI SWAT team to protect his girlfriend, country music singer Alexis Wilkins, and had taken multiple taxpayer-funded jet trips to visit her—including a golf outing. The story suggested Patel’s behavior was drawing internal frustration, and that Trump was eyeing Andrew Bailey, co-Deputy Director and former Missouri Attorney General, as a replacement. The White House didn’t wait to respond. Within hours, Karoline Leavitt, the Press Secretary, posted on X: "This story is completely made up. I was in the Oval Office when President Trump was meeting with his law enforcement team, including FBI Director Kash Patel. I read the headline to him—and he laughed. He said: 'What? That’s totally false. Come on Kash, let’s take a picture to show them you’re doing a great job!'"> MS NOW stood by its sourcing, but no other outlet echoed its claims. Instead, The Jerusalem Post, NDTV, LiveNOW from FOX, and ABC 33/40 all reported the White House’s denial verbatim. The contradiction was stark: one outlet with anonymous sources versus the President, his Press Secretary, and multiple senior officials—all saying the same thing.Patel’s Defense and the Legal Tightrope
Patel didn’t deny the jet trips or the security detail. He defended them as necessary. "I carry sensitive communications equipment," he told a small group of reporters on November 24, 2025. "When I’m off-base, I need secure lines. That’s not luxury—it’s protocol." He pointed out that other senior officials, including Deputy Director Dan Bongino, had used similar arrangements in past administrations. But the optics were bad. A federal agency’s resources being used for personal travel—even if technically permitted—looked like abuse, especially amid broader public distrust of government spending. The New York Times noted that while no law explicitly barred such use, the Department of Justice’s internal ethics guidelines strongly discouraged it. The report also flagged that both Patel and Bongino were better known for their conservative media appearances than their law enforcement resumes. That raised eyebrows in Justice Department circles, where career agents reportedly felt uneasy about the politicization of the FBI’s leadership.Who Could Replace Patel? The 90-Day Rule
If Trump did want to replace Patel, the path wasn’t simple. Under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, he could appoint Andrew Bailey as acting director—but only after Bailey had served 90 days in his current role. Bailey was confirmed on September 15, 2025. That meant the earliest he could step in without Senate approval was December 15, 2025. Even then, his tenure would be capped at 210 days unless confirmed by the Senate. That timeline matters. If Trump wanted to make a permanent change before the 2026 midterm elections, he’d need Senate buy-in. And with Democrats controlling the Senate, confirmation would be a long, bitter fight. Some insiders say that’s why the idea of replacing Patel was never seriously floated—it was politically toxic.
Trump’s Public Endorsements
The White House wasn’t just denying the report—they were doubling down. During the Thanksgiving turkey pardon ceremony on November 20, 2025, Trump pulled Patel aside on stage. "You’ve been very busy doing a great job," he said, smiling. "See? You’ve got a following, Kash." The crowd clapped. Trump added, "We need people like you." A week earlier, during a Fox News Radio interview, Trump had called Patel "one of the most loyal and effective people I’ve ever worked with." That wasn’t just political theater. It was a signal—to the FBI, to the media, and to the public—that Patel wasn’t going anywhere.Why This Story Matters
This isn’t just about a jet or a security detail. It’s about the erosion of trust in media and the weaponization of rumors. MS NOW didn’t provide documents, emails, or even named sources. Just "three people who know." Meanwhile, the White House offered video, direct quotes, and multiple official statements. It’s also a reminder that in today’s political climate, even baseless rumors can create chaos. For weeks, critics of the Trump administration had been pushing narratives about "cronyism" at the FBI. This report, however flimsy, gave them fuel. And for supporters, the White House’s swift, forceful response was proof the administration was fighting back.
What’s Next?
Patel’s job isn’t technically safe until the Senate confirms a director. But for now, the President’s words carry more weight than any anonymous tip. The next key date? December 15, 2025—the day Bailey could legally step in. If nothing happens by then, the story fades. If Patel vanishes from public view? That’s when the real questions begin.Frequently Asked Questions
Why would Trump publicly defend Kash Patel if he was really considering firing him?
Publicly backing Patel served multiple purposes: it shut down damaging speculation, reinforced loyalty among Trump’s base, and signaled stability to law enforcement agencies. Trump has a history of using public endorsements to neutralize leaks—especially when the alternative is appearing indecisive or chaotic. His laughter and photo-op with Patel weren’t just reactions—they were strategic.
Is it legal for an FBI Director to use government jets to visit a girlfriend?
Technically, yes—if the travel serves official duties, like maintaining secure communications. But DOJ ethics guidelines discourage personal use, even if not explicitly illegal. The issue isn’t legality—it’s perception. When the FBI’s director is flying to see a country music singer on a taxpayer-funded jet, it looks like favoritism, regardless of the justification.
Could Andrew Bailey really become FBI Director without Senate confirmation?
Yes, but only temporarily. Under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, Bailey could serve as acting director starting December 15, 2025, after completing 90 days in his current role. He could remain in that position for up to 210 days without Senate approval. But any permanent appointment requires confirmation—which would face fierce opposition given his political background.
Why did so many news outlets report the White House denial while only MS NOW ran the original story?
Most reputable outlets prioritize verified sources and official statements. MS NOW relied on anonymous, uncorroborated claims. Meanwhile, the White House provided video evidence, direct quotes from Trump and Leavitt, and multiple formal statements. In journalism, the burden of proof lies with the accuser—and MS NOW didn’t meet it.
What does this say about the state of media and political reporting?
It highlights how quickly unsubstantiated rumors can go viral—and how hard it is to correct them. Even when the President and Press Secretary deny something outright, the original headline often sticks in public memory. This case shows the need for media literacy: context, sourcing, and corroboration matter more than ever.
Is Kash Patel’s job secure long-term?
As of now, yes—Trump has publicly backed him, and no credible evidence suggests otherwise. But the FBI Director serves at the President’s pleasure. If future scandals emerge, or if Patel’s leadership falters in a major investigation, even Trump’s support could shift. For now, though, he’s safe.
Write a comment